COMMUNITY  |  EDUCATION  |  INTERNATIONAL  |  IP INDUSTRY  |  AOP NEWS  |  CROWDSOURCING  |  TOP 5

 

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Other Patent Blog Postings

Thursday, May 17, 2012
The tiny island state of Singapore has begun to ramp up its capacity for patent search and...Read More
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Reporting a Crackdown on Patently Absurd Lawsuits
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Cipla breached patent rights by slashing drug prices: says Bayer
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Import of patented goods without IPR holder’s authorisation is permissible: Says indian authority
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Everlight's Subsidiary Zenaro Get Involved in Nichia’s Patent lawsuit

Patent Quality Matters | Article One Partners Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Early-Stage Patent Litigation: May 14

  
  
  

Here's our latest close look into a recent patent litigation case centered on patent quality.

 

Display Technologies Inc. v. Universal Surveillance Corp.

Case number 10-cv-209 - U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island


Display Technologies Inc. has filed suit against Universal Surveillance Corp. for infringement of three patents that relate to electronic article surveillance anti-theft tags.

 

U.S. Patent Numbers 7,518,521 and 7,626,501 are titled "Anti-theft tag" and "Rotating anti-theft tag" and cover technologies for electronic markers that attach to goods using systems that make them hard to remove. Patent D543,590 is a design patent that for the ornamental design of a rotating anti-theft tag.

 

According to the complaint, in August 2007, Display Technologies contacted Universal alleging infringement of the ‘590 patent by one of its Swivel Tag products. The complaint also states that Universal subsequently agreed to discontinue the product, but has kept offering it for sale and has also added further infringing merchandise to its line of products.

 

The suit asks for treble damages, compensatory damages "in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty of defendant's gross sales of all accused products", disgorgement of ill-gotten profits, pre-judgment interest and a permanent injunction against future sales of the products that infringe the patents.

Comments

There are no comments on this article.
Comments have been closed for this article.